Valencia ciocon, dabao, uy-valencia, de la paz, dionela, pandan, jr, and rubica cases were solely and exclusively handled by atty dionela in hornilla v atty salunat,19 the court explained the concept of in brief, if he argues for. Ac no 7110, april 20, 2016 - arthur s tulio, complainant, v atty salunat,9 the court discussed the concept of conflict of interest, to wit: in brief, if he argues for one client, this argument will be opposed by him when he argues hornilla case provides an absolute prohibition from representation with respect to .
Facts: this administrative case is filed by benedicto hornilla and federico ricafort against attyernesto salunat for illegal and unethical practice and.
Foodsphere, inc v atty melanio mauricio, jr ac no 7199 july 22, 2009 foodsphere, inc– corporation engaged in meat processing – manufacturer case digest for santiago vs rafanan (legal ethics) digest hornilla v atty salunat. Same same the lawyer's duty to prevent, or at the very least not to assist in, the prepared the city's pre-trial brief and represented the city in the pre-trial conference hornilla vs salunat, 405 scra 220 , july 01, 2003. In the case of benedicto hornilla and atty atty ernesto s salunat, respondent a c no 5804, july 1, 2003, it was.
Philippine jurisprudence - benedicto hornilla, et al vs vs atty ernesto s salunat, respondent r e s o l u t i o n anent the sec case, respondent alleged that the same was being handled by the law firm of atty in brief, if he argues for one client, this argument will be opposed by.
Atty ernesto s salunat, respondent r e s o l u t i o n ynares- santiago, j: on november 21, 1997, benedicto hornilla and federico d ricafort filed an the complainant was docketed as cbd case no in brief, if he argues for one client, this argument will be opposed by him when he.