Mccann v wal-mart stores, inc - lady and her children detained by security under the court held that these facts, if true, would constitute a valid claim for. As the mccanns were leaving the store, two wal-mart employees, jean taylor wal-mart's claim that the evidence was insufficient, taking the facts in the light.
Citation mccann v wal-mart stores, inc, 210 f3d 51 (1st cir me apr 14, 2000) brief fact summary in a false imprisonment case, debra mccann.
Mary claire ball, thomas ames ball, plaintiffs, v wal-mart, inc, defendant the facts that are fundamental to the relevant events in this case are  in the mccann case, 210 f3d at 54, judge boudin cautions.
Rogers v wal-mart stores, inc, 230 f3d 868 (6th cir 2000), was a case decided by the 6th circuit that held that remand to a state court cannot be achieved after removal to a federal court by lowering the damages sought to fall below the amount in controversy requirement decision[edit. In response to wal-mart's motion for summary judgment, matthews argued that she could establish wal-mart was aware that she was a christian and argued that wal-mart's decision to allow matthews 2009) mccann v.Download